One control. Many standards. No duplication.
Cybereen pre-maps the overlap between Essential Eight, ISO 27001, ISO 27002, APRA CPS 234, APRA CPS 230, ISO 42001, and NIST CSF — so the work you do for one audit counts toward the next.
Work once. Audit many. Stop duplicating.
Mapping in Cybereen isn't a spreadsheet of cross-references. It's an engine that watches every control you implement and quietly counts it toward every standard it satisfies.
Pre-mapped overlaps for 8 standards (and counting).
Essential Eight, ISO 27001, ISO 27002, APRA CPS 234, APRA CPS 230, ISO 42001, NIST CSF 2.0 — already cross-walked by our team. You don't build the mapping; you use it.
Work-once dashboards across multiple audits.
One assessment progress bar updates many standards in real time. Hit 80% on E8 ML2 and watch ISO and NIST coverage move with it — no parallel spreadsheets.
Gap analysis that respects what you've already covered.
Cybereen shows you only the unique controls each new standard adds — not the shared base you've already done. Adopt a second framework in days, not quarters.
Three steps. Years of leverage.
From "which controls overlap?" to a live, scored, multi-standard view of your program — without ever building a cross-walk yourself.
Pick your active standards.
Tick the standards your auditors actually ask about. Add more later — the mapping engine recalculates overlap in seconds, not weeks.
See the overlap map.
Cybereen highlights which controls double-, triple-, or quadruple-count. Dark cells are the heaviest hitters — one control answering four standards at once.
Work the unique controls.
Focus effort on the controls each standard adds, not on re-doing the shared base. Adopt a new standard and you'll typically face a fraction of the work you feared.
350-person AU healthcare provider. Three standards. One program.
Privacy-regulated, APRA-adjacent through their underwriting, and contractually obliged to Essential Eight ML2 by their largest payer. Three audits, three vocabularies — until the overlap engine consolidated them.
From 387 controls across three standards down to 142 they actually manage.
Before Cybereen: a 600-row spreadsheet trying to track three frameworks side-by-side, with the security manager re-typing the same evidence into three different cells. After: one program. The mapping engine showed 63% of controls were shared across all three — leaving a much shorter list of genuinely unique work.
managed by the team
three standards
one program live
cycle by the GRC lead
"I stopped maintaining a triple-column spreadsheet the week we turned this on. We work one program. Three audits read it differently — that's the mapping engine's problem, not mine anymore."
Mapping is the multiplier for everything else.
One assessment progress bar updates many standards. One piece of evidence fulfils every mapped control. One heat map shows coverage across every framework you've turned on.
Multi-standard mapping
The overlap engine that watches every control you implement and counts it toward every standard it satisfies. Full / Partial / Implies scoring, transparent methodology, customisable.
The three we get asked first.
Whose mappings are these? +
Can I add custom mappings? +
What about partial overlaps? +
Stop maintaining the triple-column spreadsheet.
Turn on the standards your auditors ask about. We'll show you which controls already overlap, what's genuinely new, and how much work you don't actually need to do.